The Perception by Finance Faculty of the Diverse Publication Outlets

Augustine C. Arize, John Malindretos, Alex Panayides, Lawrence Verzani
International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, Volume 14, Issue 1, 120-129, 2024
DOI: 10.35808/ijfirm/384

Abstract:

Purpose: We designed a questionnaire to test the key question whether journals receive the highest ranking of any publication form. Design/Methodology/Approach: There are seven questions in our questionnaire. We sent the survey to two thousand recipients composed of faculty, chair people and practitioners. Those individuals were chosen randomly from a bigger list of the Financial Management Association. Findings: We received two hundred and twenty nine usable responses. One hundred and seventy or 81% were faculty, twenty-five or 12% were chair people, two or 1% were practitioners and thirteen or 6% were other. As far as “other” is concerned, they could be professors of financial planning and/or insurance. Ninety six percent (96%) were from Business Schools, and four percent (4%) were from Liberal Arts. Practical Implications: Generally, the respondents ascribe high values to journal publications and depending on the question low or very low values to non-journal dissemination of research. Originality/Value: This research confirms the general attitude that journal publication matter a lot. It also supports the corollary view that other forms of research dissemination do not matter as much or at all.


Cite Article (APA Style)